Skip navigation
Prison Phone Justice

Search

More search options »
120 results
Page 2 of 6. « Previous | 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Next »

ID Valley County - Securus Contract 2016-2017
Kickback publication • July 17, 2019
Filed under: Telephones, Telephone Access, Telephone Rates, Attorney Calls, Telephone Monitoring
and tecord inmate or other administrative telephone calls, or transmit or receive inmate electronic messages ("e-mail'), by providing the Application, we make !lQ. representation or warranty as to the legality ...
IL Grundy County - Securus contract 2011-2012
Kickback publication • July 17, 2019
Filed under: Telephones, Telephone Access, Telephone Rates, Attorney Calls, Telephone Monitoring
own compliance_ The Provider ag rees to install and implement the Inmate Telephone System according to the law governing the Provider, the instruction lt receives from t he Customer as to the Customer's ...
IL Clinton County - ICS RFP 2016
Kickback publication • July 17, 2019
Filed under: Telephones, Telephone Access, Telephone Rates, Attorney Calls, Telephone Monitoring
Franklin St Carlyle, IL 62231 RE: Proposal to Provide Inmate Telephone Services Dear Sheriff Maue & Chief Deputy Dall: Thank you for the opportunity to submit this Proposal to provide Inmate Telephone ...
IA Scott County - GTL contract 2014-2019
Kickback publication • July 17, 2019
Filed under: Telephones, Telephone Access, Telephone Rates, Attorney Calls, Telephone Monitoring
of this Agreement. Scott Coun~, Iowa 600 West 4 Street Davenport, IA 52801 5. Rates. The telephone rate structure and surcharge rates shall not exceed the maximum rates as authorized by the state's telecommunication ...
IA Pottawattamie County - Evercom contract 2006-2011
Kickback publication • July 17, 2019
Filed under: Telephones, Telephone Access, Telephone Rates, Attorney Calls, Telephone Monitoring
Event to our Technical Support Department ("Technical Support"). You may contact Technical Support 24 hours a day, seven days a week (except in the event of planned or emergency outages) by telephone ...
IA Pottawattamie County - Securus RFP 2010
Kickback publication • July 17, 2019
Filed under: Telephones, Telephone Access, Telephone Rates, Attorney Calls, Telephone Monitoring, Cell Phone Access
, SECURUS Technologies, Inc., providing services through our wholly owned subsidiary Evercom Systems, Inc., is pleased to submit our response to the Pottawattamie County Sheriff's Office Inmate Telephone ...
AZ Yuma County - Legacy Contract 2016-2017
Kickback publication • July 17, 2019
Filed under: Telephones, Telephone Access, Telephone Rates, Attorney Calls, Telephone Monitoring
will provide and maintain for the life of this Agreement inmate telephones, Bridge Communication Devices (BCDs) and associated equipment to be installed at the Yuma County Detention Center- Main Facility ...
IL Cook County-EDOVO contract 2019-2026
Kickback publication • July 17, 2019
Filed under: Telephones, Telephone Access, Attorney Calls, Telephone Monitoring
IL Cook County-EDOVO contract 2019-2026
Imagine Pleading Guilty Because You Can’t Afford to Call Your Lawyer
Article • July 2, 2019 • from PLN July, 2019
Filed under: Attorneys, Telephones, Telephone Rates, Attorney Calls
Imagine Pleading Guilty Because You Can’t Afford to Call Your Lawyer by Victoria Law by Victoria Law, Truthout Imagine paying $20.12 for a 15-minute phone call. That’s how much a call from the Jennings Adult Correctional Facility in Missouri costs. In 2013, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) set rate caps …
Washington v. City of New York, NY, Second Amended Complaint, Inmate Abuse, 2019
Brief • June 6, 2019
Filed under: Failure to Treat, Body Cavity Searches, Jail Specific, Excessive Force, Class Notice, Attorney Calls, Failure to Protect (Staff), Fourteenth Amendment, rights, Sixth Amendment, 42 U.S. Code § 1983, civil action for deprivation of rights
Washington v. City of New York, NY, Second Amended Complaint, Inmate Abuse, 2019 Case 1:18-cv-12306-CM Document 112 Filed 06/06/19 Page 1 of 103 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DAVON WASHINGTON, PARIIS TILLERY, JOHN DOE, and STEVEN ESPINAL, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, …
Washington DOC - JPay Amendment #9 2019-2020
Kickback publication • 2019
Filed under: Telephones, Telephone Access, Telephone Rates, Attorney Calls, Telephone Monitoring
Washington DOC - JPay Amendment #9 2019-2020 State of Washington Department of Corrections Contract No. K8262 Amendment No. 9 This Amendment is made by the Washington State Department of Corrections, hereinafter referred to as “Department,” and JPay, Inc., hereinafter referred to as the “Contractor,” for the purpose of amending the …
Prison Policy Initiative Issues Report on State of Prison Phone Justice
Article • May 3, 2019 • from PLN May, 2019
Filed under: Statistics/Trends, Telephones, Telephone Access, Telephone Rates, Attorney Calls
Prison Policy Initiative Issues Report on State of Prison Phone Justice by Matthew Clarke by Matt Clarke  On February 11, 2019, the non-profit Prison Policy Initiative (PPI) issued a report on the “State of Phone Justice,” noting progress on reducing state prison phone rates but fewer reforms in local jails, …
Alaska Jail Recorded Attorney-client Conversations for Four Years
Article • August 8, 2018 • from PLN August, 2018
Filed under: Jail Misconduct, Attorney Client, Attorney Calls, Telephone Monitoring
Alaska Jail Recorded Attorney-client Conversations for Four Years by Monte McCoin by Monte McCoin On January 15, 2018, the Anchorage Daily News reported that, from 2012 to 2016, confidential conversations between criminal defendants and their attorneys were routinely recorded by a long-abandoned audio monitoring system in a visitation room at …
Innovation Law Lab, Et Al. v. Nielsen, Et Al., OR, Order, Denied Immigration Lawyers, 2018
Brief • June 25, 2018
Filed under: Appointment of Counsel, Attorney Client, Immigration, Telephone Access, Attorney Calls, Attorney Visits, Fifth Amendment
, to facilitate the attorney’s consultation with a detainee who does not speak English by calling a telephone-accessible interpreter or interpretation service. Attorney calls may not be monitored, after Defendants ...
Washington DOC - JPay Amendment #8 2018-2019
Kickback publication • 2018
Filed under: Telephones, Telephone Access, Telephone Rates, Attorney Calls, Telephone Monitoring
Washington DOC - JPay Amendment #8 2018-2019 State of Washington Department of Corrections This Amendment Contract No. K8262 Amendment No. 8 is made by the state of Washington, Department of Corrections, hereinafter referred to as Department, and JPay, Inc., hereinafter referred to as the Contractor, for the purpose of amending …
Pearson et. al. v. Hodgson and Securus Technologies Inc., phone kickback scheme complaint, 2018
Brief • May 2, 2018
Filed under: Telephones, Telephone Access, Telephone Rates, Attorney Calls, Mental Health, Family
. The Plaintiffs seek to end an illegal kickback scheme orchestrated by the Defendants that has nearly doubled the cost of telephone calls made from Bristol County correctional facilities - causing harm to prisoners ...
No Right to Private Attorney Call for Iowa DUI Arrestee Prior to Consent to Breathalyzer Test
Article • August 22, 2017
Filed under: Drug Testing, Attorney Calls
No Right to Private Attorney Call for Iowa DUI Arrestee Prior to Consent to Breathalyzer Test by Lonnie Burton by Lonnie Burton On June 24, 2016, the Supreme Court of Iowa rejected the appeal ...
Nevada Federal Court Dismisses Suit over Attorney-Client Phone Call Monitoring
Article • August 22, 2017
Filed under: Attorney Client, Attorney Calls
makes the practice of periodically 'checking in' on the calls of inmates after initial screening to ensure they are still privileged, i.e., that the attorney had not handed the telephone over to a non ...
ICE Settles Suit Filed by Immigration Detainees, Pays $405,000 in Attorney Fees
Article • June 9, 2017 • from PLN June, 2017
Filed under: Appointment of Counsel, Immigration, Attorney Calls
removal proceedings.  “Defendants have violated Plaintiffs’ right to representation of counsel by denying and severely restricting Plaintiffs’ ability to make telephone calls ...
Hines v. Mincks, WA, Prelim. Inj. - Jail Attorney Phone Call Policy, 2017.bak
Brief • May 25, 2017
Filed under: Telephones, Attorney Calls, Sixth Amendment
(the “Jail”) who allege that their Sixth Amendment right to the assistance of counsel is being infringed by the Jail’s restrictive telephone call and written correspondence policy. They therefore move ...
Page 2 of 6. « Previous | 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Next »