Skip navigation

Search

74 results
Article • June 9, 2017 • from PLN June, 2017
removal proceedings.  “Defendants have violated Plaintiffs’ right to representation of counsel by denying and severely restricting Plaintiffs’ ability to make telephone calls
Brief • May 19, 2017
Sawchuck v. Jenne, FL, Order, Attorney-Client Communications, 2007 ,~.- Case 0:06-cv-61182- KAM Document 49 " Entered on FLSD Docket 03/30/2007 Page UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 06- 61182- Civ- MARRAlJOHNSON JOSEPH SAWCHUCK and RICHARD SPENCER individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated Plaintiffs ...
Brief • May 19, 2017
to telephone access 419 F. Supp. 2d 820 836 (E.D. Va. 2005) (prison See also U. S. v. Lentz, policy of recording and monitoring all inmate telephone calls did not infringe Plaintiffs Sixth Amendment rights
Article • March 28, 2017
;underestimate because it does not include calls to attorney cellphone numbers. In other words, the 14,000 attorney calls are potentially just a small subset of the attorney-client calls that were
Brief • September 1, 2016
California v. Niroula, CA, Def Mot for Order protecting attorney-client calls, sheriff illegal telephone monitoring, 2011 Kaushal Niroula Defendant In Pro Per Booking # 200910575 Indio Jail P.O. Box
Publication • August 9, 2016
and adopted), parents and siblings (birth, step, adopted and half). Attorney calls - offender calls to verified attorneys. Telephone monitoring - the electronic tracking, recording, and listening to of offender
Article • August 2, 2016 • from PLN August, 2016
not include calls to attorney cell phone numbers. In other words, the 14,000 attorney calls are potentially just a small subset of the attorney-client calls that were hacked. In short, it turns out
Securus Faces Lawsuit Over Recorded Attorney Calls by Alex Friedmann On May 27, 2016, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Securus Technologies, Inc. in the U.S. District Court
Brief • July 19, 2016
Lyon v. ICE, CA, Settlement, class action telephone access, 2016 1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 AUDLEY BARRINGTON LYON, JR
Brief • March 10, 2016
Filed under: Attorney Calls
to conduct confidential telephone conferences with plaintiff Constantine Cheese, via telephone, at mutually agreeable dates and times for plaintiff's counsel and the Correctional Facility staff. The plaintiff
Article • October 26, 2015 • from PLN November, 2015
Prisoner’s Right to Counsel Violated by Eavesdropping on Attorney Phone Calls by Christopher Zoukis Prisoner’s Right to Counsel Violated by Eavesdropping on Attorney Phone Calls by Christopher Zoukis Charges against a Washington man awaiting trial on felony drug and stolen property charges were dropped by a Yakima County Superior Court ...
Publication • September 11, 2015
Filed under: Attorney Calls
; and 8. The call must not exceed 30 minutes in duration. An inmate shall receive the attorney call at one of the following locations as determined by the correctional facility: 1. An inmate phone booth
Brief • September 2, 2014
Filed under: Attorney Calls
Andersen v Becker Co. MN Settlement Transaction of Settlement Attorney Calls Monitored 2010 CASE 0:08-cv-05687-ADM-RLE Document 82 Filed 05/04/10 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT
Brief • July 10, 2014
that “Witherow does not allege that any of his attorney calls were intercepted, monitored, or eavesdropped on by Embarq or that Embarq had 4 Case: 13-17361 07/10/2014 ID: 9164537 DktEntry: 61-2 Page: 11 of 50
Brief • March 26, 2014
initially intercepting and monitoring Witherow’s telecommunications with his attorneys and the re-monitoring of attorney-client telephone ii Case: 13-17361 03/26/2014 ID: 9033089 DktEntry: 13 Page: 4
Brief • March 7, 2012
of Privacy in His Telephonic Communications With His Attorneys. Plaintiff Witherow objects to Judge Cooke’s finding that no genuine issue of material fact exists as to whether he had an actual subjective
Article • December 15, 2011 • from PLN December, 2011
Recording of Nashville, Tennessee Jail Prisoners’ Attorney Calls Criticized by In February 2011 it was revealed that the Davidson County Sheriff’s Office in Nashville, Tennessee had recorded
Article • November 15, 2011
Right to Counsel Not Violated by Brig Officials Present During Attorney Phone Calls by On May 1, 2008, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Services affirmed a lower court’s judgment rejecting a service member’s claim that he was denied the right to appellate counsel because brig officials were ...
Brief • July 19, 2011
access restricted for safety and security reasons. Ex. 18, #205-18, pp. 2-3. AR 722.07(1.2-1.3): Inmate legal access (effective date 9/6/03) 1.1 All inmates are to use the unit or yard telephones for legal
conversations made by Eye. CCA turned the conversations over to the government, but the discs also contained recordings of calls between Eye and his lawyer. The attorney calls were not segregated. Prior
Page 1 of 4. | 1 2 3 4 | Next »