This text is machine-read, and may contain errors. Check the original document to verify accuracy.
STATE OF ALABAMA
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
DIVISION OF PURCHASING
CONTRACT NO.
BUYER
BUYER PHONE
T-NUMBER
DATE ISSUED
VENDOR NUMBER
VENDOR PHONE
STATE TERM CONTRACT CHANGE
SNAP REQ. NO.
EFFECTIVE DATE
I - - - - - - - . l . . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ; EXPIRATION DATE
SOLICITATION NO.
1-------------------1
GLOBAL TEL*LINK
2609 CAMERON ST
MOBILE
STATE TERM CONTRACT
AL 36607
TELEPHONE SERVICES - PAY AND INMATE
CHANGE EFFECTIVE DATES OF THE CONTRACT TO: JUNE 1, 2007 THROUGH
MAY 31, 2010 PER COURT ORDER, CASE NO. CV-2007-407, CIRCUIT
COURT, MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA, JUDGE EUGENE W. REESE, PRESIDING.
JS/TC
* * * * * * * * * * * * END OF ADDENDUM * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
APPROVED:
PURCHASE COPY
4009489
CHANGE NO. : 01
JENNIFER SIGLER
(334) 242-7370
TA497
06/13/07
63107100100
(251)479-4500
1346561
06/01/07
05/31/10
2170936
STATE OF ALABAMA
FINANCE
DIVISION OF PURCHASING
DEPARTMENT~F
1-------------------1
AGENCY TERM CONTRACT AWARD
1-------....1....-------------------1
GLOBAL TEL*LINK
2609 CAMERON ST
MOBILE
CONTACT PERSON:
CONTRACT NO.
BUYER
BUYER PHONE
T-NUMBER
DATE ISSUED
SNAP REQ. NO.
EFFECTIVE DATE
EXPIRATION DATE
SOLICITATION NO.
VENDOR NUMBER
VENDOR PHONE
4009489
JENNIFER SIGLER
(334) 242-7370
TA497
06/12/07
1346561
06/01/07
05/31/10
07-X-2170936
63107100100
(251 )479-4500
AL 36607
TERESA RIDGEWAY
TELEPHONE SERVICES - PAY AND INMATE
AGENCY TERM CONTRACT :
06/01/07 TO 05/31/10
1.
EFFECTIVE PERIOD:
2.
F.O.B. POINT:
3.
DELIVERY TERMS:
4.
CASH DISCOUNT TERMS:
5.
BID REFERENCE NO.:
6.
AWARDED LINES:
7.
DISCOUNTS: UNIT PRICES INCLUDE ALL APPLICABLE DISCOUNTS
DESTINATION
ASAP
NET
00002
ALL TERMS, CONDITIONS, AND ANY AMENDMENTS TO SOLICITATION
ARE PART OF THIS CONTRACT AS IF FULLY REPRODUCED HEREIN.
APPROVED:
PURCHASE COpy
07-X-2170936
PRICE SHEET
.
AGENCY TERM CONTRACT AWARD
,
VENDOR : GLOBAL TEl*LINK
CONTRACT NO. :
VENDOR NO. :
4009489
63107100100
PAGE
2
LINE
NO.
ESTIMATED
QUANTITY
COMMODITY/SERVICE DESCRIPTION
UNIT
PERC
UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE BELOW:
SHIP TO:
R1
STATEWIDE
00001 COMMODITY CODE: 915-77-075872
TELEPHONE SERVICE - INMATE
COMMISSION PERCENTAGE TO BE PAID
1
EA
61.50%
00002 COMMODITY CODE: 915-77-075872
TELEPHONE SERVICE - PUBLIC PAY TELEPHONE
COMMISSION PERCENTAGE TO BE PAID
1
EA
61.50%
PURCHASE COPY
EKTENDED AMT
IF APPLICABLE
SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS
AGENCY TERM CONTRACT AWARD
VENDOR : GLOBAL TEL*LINK
CONTRACT NO.:
T-NUMBER
:
4009489
TA497
PAGE
3
3 YEAR CONTRACT WITH TWO RENEWAL YEARS:
TO ESTABLISH A THREE YEAR CONTRACT WITH FIRM PRICING AND TWO OPTIONAL
RENEWAL YEARS.
USAGE: STATE AGENCIES, POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS, CITY AND COUNTY
AGENCIES. STATE COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES, MUNICIPALITIES.
ANNUAL AGREEMENT:
THE PURCHASE ORDER CONSTITUTES A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE STATE OF ALABAMA
AND THE VENDOR. THE VENDOR ACCCEPTS THE CONTRACT AS WRITTEN AND WILL
FULFILL ALL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE VALID PERIOD INDICATED.
CHANGES/MODIFICATIONS ARE ALLOWED ONLY BY A WRITTEN PURCHASE ORDER
CHANGE THROUGH THE DIVISION OF PURCHASING.
INVOICE TO BE BILLED IN ARREARS, TO THE "BILL TO" ADDRESS.
**********************************************************************
NOTICE
*****************************
************************
NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION OF THIS I.T.B., DEPARTMENT OF
FINANCE ADMINISTRATIVE RULES 355-4-1-.01 THROUGH 355-4-1-.09 WHICH
GOVERN THE PURCHASE OF GOODS AND SERVICES FROM THE LOWEST
RESPONSIBLE BIDDER ARE NOT APPLICABLE TO THIS TRANSACTION.
**********************************************************************
PURCHASE COPY
CONTRACT CHANGE
CONTRACT #: 4009489 Global Tel*Link
CHG #:
01
TA#:
497
PLEASE MAKE THE FOLLOWING CHANGES:
CHANGE EFFECTIVE DATES OF THE CONTRACT TO:
JUNE 01, 2007 - MAY 31,2010
PER COURT ORDER, CASE NO. CV-2007-407
CIRCUIT COURT, MONTGOMERY, AL
JUDGE EUGENE W. REESE, PRESIDING
THANK YOU,
}/fJiL
6/12/2007
STATE OF ALABAMA
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
DIVISION OF PURCHASING
BOB RILEY
Governor
JAMES ALLEN MAIN
Director of Finance
RSA Union Building
100 North Union Street Suite 192
P.O. Box 302620
Montgomery, Alabama 36130-2620
Telephone (334) 242-7250
Fax (334) 242-4419
www.purchasing.alabama.gov
Jim Burns
Chief Information Officer
To:
ISAAC KERVIN
State Purchasing Director
•
From:
Date:
June 12,2007
Subject:
ITB 07-X-2170936 - Inmate and Public Payphones
Please find attached (Located in Attachment "A") an "ORDER OF THE COURT" issued
by Circuit Judge Eugene W. Reese. This ORDER resulted from the Circuit Court for
Montgomery County, Court Case No. CV-2007-407. Within this ORDER, the Judge ordered the
State of Alabama to consider the contract resulting from Invitation-to-Bid (lTB) 07-X-2170936
as a valid and binding State Term Contract. The State was further ordered, to recognize the
effective date of the contract as June 1, 2007 to May 31, 2010.
As the State Purchasing Director, it is my belief that the State should follow this ORDER
OF THE COURT. Since this is an Agency Term Contract specifically bid for the Information
Services Division (lSD), you should now be free to take whatever actions necessary to execute
the terms of this contract.
I wish you and all others involved with this contract, much success!
Attachment (1 )
Cc:
Mose Stuart
Jennifer Sigler
ATTACHMENT
"A"
No, 0615
6, 2007 1: 36PM
Jilh,
'
. IN TIIE CIRCUIT COURT FOR.
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, ALABAMA
'GLOBAL ~*LINK C~RPORATlON,
Plaintiff,
I
}
)
)
)
.) CASE NO. CV-2007-407
v.
\
•
P. 2
.
.
STArn OF ALABAMA; ALABAMA
)
)
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE; ISAAC
KERVIN, in his official capacity as
)
-)
)
)
)
Director of the Division of Purchasing of
the Alabama Dep~ent ofFinance;
T-NETIX, INC.,
)
)
.'" ,
Defendants.
'. ORDER
This cause game to be heard on May 15, May 16 and May 17, 2007. Plain:tiff Global
Tel·Link Corporation ("GlL") brought the instant acti~n against the Defendants, State of
.
.
Alabama. Alabama DepartmeDt ofFinance. and Isaac Kervin in his official oapacl.ty as Dixector
oftbe Division ofPorcb.asing of the Alabama Department ofFinance, for declaratory judgment.
II
.Plaintiff GTI.. ciJntends that.in accordance with the Alabama Competitive Bid laws that OTL and
I
i!
the State of Alabama ent.e:red .into a contract
. on or about. December 19,2006
. referred to as
"Telephone Services .. Pay and Inmate". T-NETIX, Inc., au unsuccesSful bidder•.filed a Motion
\
to Jnter:vcp.e and the CQUIt'allowed
T-NETIX, Inc. to intervene
.
. as a defendan1 in this case. the
\I
\
Intervenor Complaint for Declaratory JudgmeIl1 filed by T-NETIX, me. was deemed a cross·
claim against the s~ defendants and a counter-olaim.. against the Plaintiff, OTL. T-NETIX, Inc.
.
contends in its C(oss:'c1aim!counter-c!aim. that the.contract between OTI. and the State of
Alabama was let in. vio1atJ.on of the Alabmna Cmnp.etitive Bid Laws. The State ofAlabama
06/08/2001 \'lED 12: 39 [TX/RX HO BS04]
r-------------------_._----
fill 002
No. 0615
Jun. 6. 2007 1:36PM
P. 3
Q
contends in this case that at all times the State officials acted in good fai~ but the Staie does
request that the oontract'be rebicl.
The Court has considered all of the evidence and applicable legal authorities. The Court
finds as follows: In awarding the contract to OTL. the State ofAlabama complied with the
Alaba:xna Competitive Bid laws. On December
19,2006. the state ofAlabama and OTt entered
,
,
into a contract for "Telephone Services Pay and Inmate". In awarding
M
the eontr:a.et to 'GTL, the
State offioials aoted in,good faith. The contract called for delivery "asap". OTL proceeded ': '
immediately in accordance with the contract and incurred approximately $350,000 in purchasing
equipment and approximately 450 plus m.aD.Mhours ~fore on was stopped by the State on
,
February 1, 2007. The State does not contend nor is there any evidence that OTL breacl1ed the
contract between the State and GlL. In fact, the evidence is clear that ori. has complied with
the Decembet 19,2006 contract T-NETIX. Inc. was an unsuecessfuJ. bidder and protested an.
reeeiving the contract. However, TMNETIX. Inc. did no~ provide the State of Alabatna with. any
,
,
specific cOmplaints until Janual'y 31, 2007. Beginnb:ag on or about February 1, 20~7, the State
ofiioials re-evaluated the bid responses. Around the mid~e of February 2007 (appro~~ly
two months after ihe contract
waS entered into between.the State of.Alabama and GTL), the State
4etermin~d that tho GTL bid response to t.hf; Invitation to Bid fully complied expCct for OIle
discrepancy. The Invitation to Bid had requested two financial statements (2004 and 2005) and. it
was determined that OTL :tiled the 2004, but not the 2005 financial statement :r:o. appro~tely
I:Did--Febroary of 2007 when. this one 'discrepancy was found; it was determined by the State
officials that the State oftlcials had simply'made an honest Qrlstake
and honest error. The
evidenCe is clear and without ~ute that the state officials acted in good faith and simply made
an honest mistake. The contract between OTt and the State of Alabama CQml'rises over 350
..
08/06/2007 'lIED 12: 38
~._------------~-------------"----'-'--'--_._--
--_._-_.--
[TXlRX H[J 8904] ~ OQ3
No.0615
6. 2007 1: 36PM
Ju'n,
P. 4
pages inoluding numerous teClmica1 specifications all ofwhich OlL complied with. Whether a
,
.
bid response is. being initially evaluated or re--evaluated, the standard is the same - Did the Sta~
.
"
officisls make the contract a.ward in good faith. The State officials clearly did so inthis case. .
The Court finds 1hat the State'~:fficials acted in good faith; that there is no evidenoe that the State
officials acted in bad faith o~ arbitrarily and capriciously; that there was no igriorance on the part
of the State officials through: lack of inquixy; that there is no evidence tbnt the State officials
based the contract on any misconception ofthe law; nor is there any evidence tInt.t the a.ward was
a result of any improper influence.
The contract in. this. case was awarded in accordance with the :Alabama Competitive Bid
laws. The single most importa:o.t requirement of the Competith.:e Bid law is the good faith of the
officials charged with exeotlting the requirements of the law. The honest exercise ofdiscretion
by such officials will not be interfered with by the Courts, even if it is ettoneo~.
vvme Ya
McDonald Ford Tractor CompanI. 248 So. 2d 121 (Ala. 1971); JntemRtjonal
Telecommunications Systems v. S~ 359 SQ. 2d 364, 368 (Ala. ,1978); Advance Tank &;
Constt, Co. v, A:mb Water'WorQ. 910 F. 2d. 761, 765 (11111 Cir. 1990);
'1{.
Crest ConstrUenon Cmp.
Shelby Board ofBdptiou, 612 So. Zd 425, 429 (.Ala. 1992); BrlcsSQp. OR Mobile'
,Communications. Ino.. V. Motorola Communicatioml &,E1ectronics. Inc., 657 So. 2d 857 (Ala.
1995); and TFT. InC.. v. Warning S'f!ltC!IPlL Inc-, 7~1 So.2d 1238. 1243 (A1~ 1999). .
Accordingly, it is the ORDER. of this Court that JUDGrtmNI'. is hereby entered in
favor of Global Tel~Link Corporation on its complaint fordecJaratory judgment and
against the Defendants, State ofAlabama, AlabSPl8 Department o:fFinance, Isaac Kervin
in bis ofliclal capa.ci~ as ~ireetor of the Division ofPnrchaBing of the Alabam.~
.DepartmeJAt otFinan~;,aJ;ld
T-NE1JX. Inc. Iu regard 'to the counteJ::.cbi.tnlcross-clahu
,
;
"
013/013/2007 lED 12: a8 [TX/RX NO 8S04] ijj 004
I
I
\
i
i!-I
I
.----···--·---
-_.
__._--_ .._--_ _--_._--_._-_._----_ ...__._---_._ _ - - - - - - - - - - ..
..
.
: ..
Jun, 6. 2007
No,0615
1:36PM
tiled by T-NltTIX.
.
P.5
me., it is,. the ORDER of this Court that JUDGMENT is hereby entered
in favor of Global Tel"Link Corporation, State of Alabama, ~abaua Deparbnent of
Finanee and Isaac Kervin.;.n b.ii official eapadty as Director of the Division ofPurchasing
ofthe Alabama Dep~eDt~t'Fb:umceand against T-NETlX, Inc. It is further
ORDERED, ADJUDGED·'8.l1d DECREED that there is a valid bi)).ding contract·between
.
.
tho State ofAlabama and Global Tel·Link CorpontloD and that the State of Alabama
•
"f
.
•
"
shall fully and completely:~omplytherewith. Further, in that the State of'Alabama has
unquestionably delayed the contract for approximately fo'lr months, it iii further
ORDERED that the effective da~e of the contmet shall be.June 1,.2007 to May 31, 2010.
Each party shalll'espect{ully bear their own costs•.
DONE~theLdaYOf~7.
~
'
..
ire tSf~J
\.
'J,efll ~ i \l tL br..t +h'1
~~; e-' WtJl-/-tK-
\Jiw.W\~ ~. \
08/08/2007 WED 12: 38 [TX/RX NO 8504)
III 005
..
LAST
PAGE
OF
ATTACHMENT
No. 0615
Jun. 6. 2007 1: 36PM
, IN TIlE CIRCmT COURT FOR
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, ALABAMA
'GLOBAL T.I;L·LINK C~RPORATION,
P. 2
'.'
)
)
Plaintiff,
v.
.
STATE OF ALABAMA; ALABAMA
DEPARTMENT OF m~"ANCE; ISAAC
KERVIN, in his official capacity as
Director Qf the Division of Purchasing of
tho Alabama Dep~ent ofFinance;
,
T-NETIX, INC.,
., ,
Defendants.
)
)
. ) CASE NO. CV-2007~07
)
)
)
-)
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER
This canse came to be heard on May 15, May 16 and May 17,2007. PlaintiffGlobal
Tel*Link Corporation ("GTL'? brought the instant actiC?n against the Defendants, State of
Alabama, Alabama Deparlmont ofFinance. and Isaac Kervin. in his official capacity as Db:ector
of the Division ofPurchasing ofthe Alabama Department ofFinancc, for declaratory judgment.
.Plaintiff 011, cOntends that in accordance with the Alabama Competitive Bid laws that GTL and
the State of Alabama ente.red into a contract
on ox about. December 19, 2006
referred to as
,
,
I'Telepnone Services ~ Pay and Inmate".
r -NETIX. Inc., an unsuccesSful bidder, .filed a Motion
T·NETIX, Inc. to intervene
as a defendant in this case. The
to Inter:ve,ne and the CQUIf allowed
,
,
Intervenor Complaint for Declaratory Judgment filed by T-NETIX, Inc. was dce:m.ed a crossclaim against the
.
s:ate defendants and a counter-claim. against the Pla.tutiff, OTL. T-NETIX, Inc•
contends in its cross:'claimlcounter-elaim that the.contract between oli and the State of
Alabama was let in violation of the Alabama Comp.etitive Bid Laws. The State of Alabama
06/06/2001 WED 12: S8 [TXlRK NO 8904] ~ 002
No. 0615
Jun. 6. 2007 1:36PM
P. 3
o
contends in this case that at all times the State officials acted in good faith. but the State does
request that the contract'be rebid.
The Court has considered all oftbe evidence and applica.ble legal authorities. The Court
finds as follows: In awarding the contract to OTL, the State of Alabama complied with the
Alabama Competitive Bid laws. On December 19,2006, the StatC ofAlabama and GTL entered
.
.
into a contract for "Telephone Services - Pay and Inmate". In awarding the contract to 'OTt, the
State officials acted in .good faith. The contract called for deliveJ:Y "asap". GTL proceeded . .
"
immediately in accordance with the contract and incurred approximately $350,000 in purchasing
equipment and approximately 450 plus man-hours before OTL was stopped by the State on
Februm:y 1, 2007. The State does not contend nor is there anyevid.e.nce that OTL breached the
contract between the State and OTL. In fact, the evidence is clear that
on has complied with
the Decembet 19,2006 COIrtract T-NETJX. Inc. was an unsucees~ bidder and protested OTt
receiving the contract. However, T-NETIX:. Inc. did not provide the State ofAlabama with, any
.
.
specific cOmplaints until Janl.lal:y 3.1, 2007. Beginnhlg on Of about February 1, 20~7, the State
officials fe-evaluated the bid responses. Around the mid~e of February 2007 (approx.im~ly
two months after the contract waS entered into between.the State of Alabama and OTL), the State
4etennin~d that the OTL bid response to the Invitation to Bid fully complied expect for one
.
,
disctepancy. The Invitation to Bid had requested two financial statements (2004 and 2005) and it
was determined that OTL filed the 2004, but n.ot the 2005 financial statement In approxiIiiately
xnid"February of 2007 when this one 'discrepancy was found; it was determined by the State
officials that the State officials had simply'made an honest rpistake
and honest error. The
evidence is clear and without di$,pute that the State officials acted in good faith and simply made
an honest mistake. The contract between OTL and the State of Alabama comprises over 350
..
06/06/2007 WED 12: 38 [TX/RX NO 8904] ~ 003
Jun. 6. 2007
No.0615
1: 36PM
P. 4
pages including numerous teChnical specifications all ofwhich OlL complied with. Whether a
,
bid response is, being initially evaluated
o
.
or re--evaluated, the standard is the same - Did the Stat~
.'
officials make the contract award in good faith. The State officials clearly did so in this case.
The Court finds that the State' ~ffi.cials acted in good faith; that there is no evidence that the State
officials acted in. bad faith or arbitrarily and capriciously; that there was no igOOrance on the part
ofthe State officials through'lack of inquiry; that there is no evidence that the State officials
based the contract on any misconception oftbe law; nor is there any evidence that the award was
a result of any improper influence.
"0
The contract in this, case was awarded in accordance with the :Alabama Competitive Bid
laws. The single most important requirement of the Competiti~e Bid law is the good faith of the
officials charged with exeouting the requirements ofthe law. The honest exercise ofdiscretion
by such officials will not be interfered with by the Courts, even if it is crroneo~, White Y.:
McDonald Ford Imgtor Qompany. 248 So. 2d 121 (Ala. 1971); Intematiomij
Telecommunications SYstems y. State, 359 So. 2d 364, 368 (Ala. 1978); Advance Tank &
Constr. Co. v. Arab Water Wow. 910 F. 2d 761, 765 (11 th Cit. 1990); crest ConstrUction Corp.
v, Shelby Board pfEducatiQD, 612 So. 2d 425,429 (Ala. 1992); Ericsson QE Mobile
,Communications. Inc.. v. MOtoroia Communications & ,Elec1ronics. Inc", 657 So. 2d 857 (Ala.
1995); and TFT,
Inc.. II Warning Systems. Inc.. 751. So. 2d 1238, 1243 (Ala.. 1999).
'
Accordingly, it is the ORDER of this Court that JUDGMENT. is hereby entered In
favor of Global Tel~Llnk Corporation on its complaint for declaratory judgment and
against the Defendants, State of Alabama. Alaba.IQ.8 Department ofFinance, Isaac Kervin
in his official capacity, as :girector of the Division of Pu.reh3lllng of the Alabam.~
'Department of Finan~e;.~I;ld T-NETIX, Inc. In regard'to the countel";,claiD:I./cross-clalm.
'0
06/06/2007 WED 12: 38 [TX/RX NO B804 J ~ 004
No.0615
Jun. 6. 2007 1:36PM
P. 5
filed .by T-NETI;. Ine., it ~ the ORDER oftbls Court that JUDGMENT is hereby entered
in favor of Global Tel*Link Corporation, State of Alabama, Alabama Deparbnent of
Finance and Isaac Kervin. In his officia) capacity as Director of the Division of PlU'chasing
ofthe Alabama Depar~ent.()fF.b1anceand Ilgawt T-NETIX, Ine. It is fnnher
'ORDERED, ADJUDGED·ad
DECREED that there is a valid binding
\
. eontract·betwten
.
.
the State of Alabama and .Global Tel*Link Corporation and that the State of Alabama
"
shall fuDy and completely.~omplytherewith. Further, in that the State of"Alabama has
unquestionably delayed the contract for approlimately four months, it is further
ORDERED that the effective da~e of the contract shall be June 1,2007 to May 31, 2010.
Each party shall respectfully bear their own costs•.
DONE this the
£
day
fwc.
of~ 2007•.
~~=
EUG~B, ,
CIRCUlT runGE
~ tSptJ
\.
'ttfl)p VIA; It. t1t bl..( th '1
De-c~,\e. \ Wbl~~
(JiYv\W-~ ~. \
06/06/2007 WED 12:3B [TX/RX NO 8904] 111005
,t, .
~iiiA::'
~Jr
:~~!.~~~:~-:~.\~~'·l)*
*
!,
ST;,~E OF ALABAMA
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
DIVISION OF PURCHASING
~~(/
.. ~ ,
• 'I, .;
~~~
•
~~4~
.. ~ .... ~'
CONTRACT NO.
BUYER
AGENCY TERM CONTRACT AWARD
r-..------....l---------------------j
GLOBAL TEL*LINK
2609 CAMERON ST
MOBILE
CONTACT PERSON:
~~~~:B~~ONE
OATE ISSUED
TA497
12/19/06
REQ. NO.
EFFECTIVE DATE
EXPIRATION DATE
SOLICITATION NO.
VENDOR NUMBER
VENDOR PHONE
1346561
12/19/06
12/18/09
07-X-2170936
63107100100
(251)479-4500
1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ; SNAP
J3-"
4009489
JENNIFER SIGLER
(334) 242-7370
AL 36607
TERESA RIDGEWAY
AGENCY TERM CONTRACT :
TELEPHONE SERVICES -
PAY AND INMATE
1.
EFFECTIVE PERIOD:
12/19/06 TO 12/18/09
2.
F.O.B. POINT:
3.
DELIVERY TERMS:
4.
CASH DISCOUNT TERMS:
5.
BID REFERENCE NO. :
6.
AWARDED LINES:
7.
DISCOUNTS: UNIT PRICES INCLUDE ALL APPLICABLE DISCOUNTS
DESTINATION
ASAP
NET
00002
ALL TERMS, CONDITIONS, AND ANY AMENDMENTS TO SOLICITATION
ARE PART OF THIS CONTRACT AS IF FULLY REPRODUCED HEREIN.
APPROVED:
PURCHASING DIRECTOR )
PURCHASE COpy
07-X-2170936
.
,
.
PRICE SHEET
.
AGENCY TERM CONTRACT AWARD
~
VENDOR : GLOBAL TEL*lINK
LINE
NO.
CONTRACT NO.:
VENDOR NO. :
ESTIMATED
QUANTITY
COMMODITY/SERVICE DESCRIPTION
4009489
63107100100
UNIT
PERCENT
UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE BELOW:
SHIP TO:
Rl
STATEWIDE
00001 COMMODITY CODE: 915-77-075872
TELEPHONE SERVICE
INMATE
COMMISSION PERCENTAGE TO BE PAID
1
EA
61.50%
00002 COMMODITY CODE: 915-77-075872
TELEPHONE SERVICE - PUBLIC PAY TELEPHONE
COMMISSION PERCENTAGE TO BE PAID
1
EA
61.50%
PURCHASE COpy
PAGE
2
EXTENDED AMT
I F APPLICABLE
·,
.
SPECIAL TERMS AND COND.ITIONS
AGENCY TERM CONTRACT AWARD
VENOOR
CONTRACT NO.:
T-NUMBER
:
:
GLOBAL TEL*LINK
4009489
TA497
PAGE
3
3 YEAR CONTRACT WITH TWO RENEWAL YEARS:
TO ESTABLISH A THREE YEAR CONTRACT WITH FIRM PRICING AND TWO OPTIONAL
RENEWAL YEARS.
USAGE: STATE AGENCIES, POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS, CITY AND COUNTY
AGENCIES. STATE COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES, MUNICIPALITIES.
ANNUAL AGREEMENT:
THE PURCHASE ORDER CONSTITUTES A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE STATE OF ALABAMA
AND THE VENDOR. THE VENDOR ACCCEPTS THE CONTRACT AS WRITTEN AND WILL
FULFILL ALL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE VALID PERIOD INDICATED.
CHANGES/MODIFICATIONS ARE ALLOWED ONLY BY A WRITTEN PURCHASE ORDER
CHANGE THROUGH THE DIVISION OF PURCHASING.
INVOICE TO BE BILLED IN ARREARS, TO THE "BILL TO" ADDRESS.
**********************************************************************
NOTICE
*****************************
************************
NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION OF THIS I.T.B., DEPARTMENT OF
FINANCE ADMINISTRATIVE RULES 355-4-1-.01 THROUGH 355-4-1-.09 WHICH
GOVERN THE PURCHASE OF GOODS AND SERVICES FROM THE LOWEST
RESPONSIBLE BIDDER ARE NOT APPLICABLE TO THIS TRANSACTION.
**********************************************************************
PURCHASE COpy
