GTL v. FCC-ICS, Stay Order, telephone rates, 2016
Download original document:
Document text
Document text
This text is machine-read, and may contain errors. Check the original document to verify accuracy.
USCA Case #15-1461 Document #1602581 Filed: 03/07/2016 Page 1 of 2 United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ____________ No. 15-1461 September Term, 2015 FCC-80FR79136 Filed On: March 7, 2016 Global Tel*Link, Petitioner v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Respondents -----------------------------Centurylink Public Communications, Inc., et al., Intervenors -----------------------------Consolidated with 15-1498, 16-1012, 16-1029, 16-1038, 16-1046, 16-1057 BEFORE: Tatel, Brown, and Griffith, Circuit Judges ORDER Upon consideration of the motions for stay, the oppositions thereto, and the replies; the motion of the State of Oklahoma for leave to file a motion for stay and the oppositions thereto; and the motion of Network Communications International for leave to file an amicus curiae brief in response to the motions to stay, it is ORDERED that the motion of Oklahoma for leave to file a motion for stay be denied. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the motion of Network Communications International to file an amicus brief in response to the motions to stay be denied. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the motions for stay be granted in part and denied in part. The motions are granted as to the provisions of the Federal Communications Commission’s “Second Report and Order and Third Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking,” FCC 15-136 (Nov. 5, 2015), regarding 47 C.F.R. §§ 64.6010 (setting caps USCA Case #15-1461 Document #1602581 Filed: 03/07/2016 Page 2 of 2 United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ____________ No. 15-1461 September Term, 2015 on calling rates) and 64.6020(b)(2) (setting caps on fees for single-call services). With respect to these provisions, petitioners have satisfied the stringent requirements for a stay pending court review. See Winter v. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 20 (2008); D.C. Circuit Handbook of Practice and Internal Procedures 33 (2016). The motions are denied in all other respects. Per Curiam FOR THE COURT: Mark J. Langer, Clerk BY: Page 2 /s/ Robert J. Cavello Deputy Clerk