– the attorney-client privilege for
attorneycalls, and a privacy interest in avoiding unwarranted disclosure of personal calls. See
Minnesota Sch. Boards Ass'n Ins. Trust v. Employers Ins. Co. of Wausau, 183
Texas Begins Intercepting and Blocking Cell Phone Calls from Prisons by Matthew Clarke By Matt Clarke In April 2013, Texas began intercepting cell phone calls originating in two of its largest prisons. The equipment installed at the Stiles Unit in Beaumont and the McConnell Unit in Beeville is intended to ...
that “Witherow does not allege that any of his attorneycalls
were intercepted, monitored, or eavesdropped on by Embarq or that Embarq had
Page: 11 of 50
inmates and their families, which BOP has stated facilitates the reintegration of inmates into society upon release from prison," the report said. "In contrast, reducing inmate telephonerates could also
of Privacy in His Telephonic
Communications With His Attorneys.
Plaintiff Witherow objects to Judge Cooke’s finding that no genuine issue of material fact
exists as to whether he had an actual subjective
Suit Challenging Election Surveillance May Go Forward, Second Circuit Decides by A lawsuit challenging the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Amendments of 2008 (FAA) may proceed, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit decided March 21, 2011. The lower court dismissed the suit on standing grounds. Amnesty International, with ...
restricted for safety and security reasons.
Ex. 18, #205-18, pp. 2-3.
AR 722.07(1.2-1.3): Inmate legal access (effective date 9/6/03)
All inmates are to use the unit or yard telephones for legal
The Suffolk County grand jury subpoenaed the recordings of the telephone conversations of a specific prisoner at the jail. The sheriff filed a motion to quash, citing a ruling from a different
conversations made by Eye. CCA turned the conversations over to the government, but the discs also contained recordings of calls between Eye and his lawyer. The attorneycalls were not segregated.
at an Oakland, California jail. In Broward County, the sheriff settled a class-action suit that was filed after two prisoners learned their supposedly “privileged” attorneycalls were not so privileged after all
the entire time, which obviously negates any compliance with attorney-client privilege. And presumably the phone call was taped (all of the other brigs have special rooms for attorneycalls, that have phone
Andersen v. Becker County, MN, Settlement, Monitoring of Atty Calls, 2010 CASE 0:08-cv-05687-ADM-RLE Document 82 Filed 05/04/10 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA -----------------------------------------------------------) KENNETH E. ANDERSEN and ) CIVIL ACTION DELL D. HOLM, on behalf of ) NO. 08-5687 (ADM/RLE) themselves and all others ...